Today is Monday September 7, and the week just gone is worth an honest look back, because it landed on both sides of the ledger — exactly the kind of split result that shows the process working as intended rather than being judged by any single outcome.
Thunder Call won the Schweppes Handicap at Ascot at evens, despite being flagged plainly beforehand as ranking seventh of eight on our figures. That NAP was made in spite of the ratings picture, built on strong recent form and a yard in good touch rather than because the numbers supported him — and on this occasion, the case outside the ratings carried the day.
Pure Mint went the other way. Backed at 8/15 in a Listed-adjacent novice contest at Ascot, he finished sixth of seven, weakening in the closing stages after a 39-day gap since his only previous run and with his yard sitting on just a 5% strike rate over the preceding fortnight. Both of those concerns were stated clearly at the time rather than glossed over, and both appear to have been the reason behind the below-par run.
And at Longchamp, Daryz — our NAP of NAPs, selected from over 100 expert tips for a major European feature — delivered exactly as his profile suggested he might, winning the Group 2 Prix Foy in commanding fashion as a stepping stone toward defending his Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe crown next month.
Three selections, three different kinds of reasoning, three different outcomes. That's not a coincidence — it's what happens when concerns and cases are stated honestly before a result is known rather than shaped to fit it afterwards. Today's NAP is built using exactly the same process: trainer form over the trailing 14 days, the gap between Racing Post Rating and official rating, going suitability, and course and distance form specifically, published at 11am before the market moves.
✅ Try 7 days for only £1.99 — click here
Want free AI-powered tips every morning? Sign up free at horseracingoracleai.com →
Betting involves risk. Please gamble responsibly. Visit BeGambleAware.org.